Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 424521" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>Ok, I finally gathered enough courage to start this task. I know how difficult it is to get a similar image at two different magnifications and alas, mine isn't perfect either. You almost need a rail system for this and it's not that important I'm going to construct all that. This already got on my nerves in the end. DoF isn't placed identical but with an FX, I have even less wiggle-room.</p><p></p><p>I shot the 1x at f/32 and then measured the distance to get as close to 0.5x as possible. That was harder than I remembered. I shot the same scene at f/8 and that was it. Both have been live-view focused as best as possible and shot with MuP. All processing is identical besides scaling. The ones without EXIF are scaled in another program and then either used as, or scaled to normal size and then used as.</p><p></p><p>First the full shots:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]143792[/ATTACH] </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]143793[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]143794[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I'll post details in a bit, I have one in the wrong format.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 424521, member: 31330"] Ok, I finally gathered enough courage to start this task. I know how difficult it is to get a similar image at two different magnifications and alas, mine isn't perfect either. You almost need a rail system for this and it's not that important I'm going to construct all that. This already got on my nerves in the end. DoF isn't placed identical but with an FX, I have even less wiggle-room. I shot the 1x at f/32 and then measured the distance to get as close to 0.5x as possible. That was harder than I remembered. I shot the same scene at f/8 and that was it. Both have been live-view focused as best as possible and shot with MuP. All processing is identical besides scaling. The ones without EXIF are scaled in another program and then either used as, or scaled to normal size and then used as. First the full shots: [ATTACH=CONFIG]143792._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]143793._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]143794._xfImport[/ATTACH] I'll post details in a bit, I have one in the wrong format. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
Top