Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eyelight" data-source="post: 423753" data-attributes="member: 24753"><p>Just continuing the discussion in a different place since it had more to do with macro work. </p><p></p><p>My thinking is either method has it's place in the toolbox and one may work better than the other on a given subject with a given camera/lens. Change the camera and/or lens or the subject and everything changes, so your joy may definitely vary.</p><p></p><p>ETA: @<a href="http://nikonites.com/member-31330-j-see.html" target="_blank">J-see</a> , you may have processing tricks I don't use. You are welcome to add examples to the thread.</p><p></p><p>#1 - 1:1 at f/36</p><p>[ATTACH=full]143458[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>#2 - f/8 cropped from #4</p><p>[ATTACH=full]143459[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>#3 - f/8 cropped from similar shot to #4 with slightly different focus point.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]143460[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>#4 - 1:2 at f/8 (1:2 was eyeballed). The shot #2 was cropped from.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]143461[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Crop of #1 - f/36</p><p>[ATTACH=full]143468[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Crop of #2 - f/8 that was cropped from #4</p><p>[ATTACH=full]143469[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eyelight, post: 423753, member: 24753"] Just continuing the discussion in a different place since it had more to do with macro work. My thinking is either method has it's place in the toolbox and one may work better than the other on a given subject with a given camera/lens. Change the camera and/or lens or the subject and everything changes, so your joy may definitely vary. ETA: @[URL="http://nikonites.com/member-31330-j-see.html"]J-see[/URL] , you may have processing tricks I don't use. You are welcome to add examples to the thread. #1 - 1:1 at f/36 [ATTACH type="full"]143458._xfImport[/ATTACH] #2 - f/8 cropped from #4 [ATTACH type="full"]143459._xfImport[/ATTACH] #3 - f/8 cropped from similar shot to #4 with slightly different focus point. [ATTACH type="full"]143460._xfImport[/ATTACH] #4 - 1:2 at f/8 (1:2 was eyeballed). The shot #2 was cropped from. [ATTACH type="full"]143461._xfImport[/ATTACH] Crop of #1 - f/36 [ATTACH type="full"]143468._xfImport[/ATTACH] Crop of #2 - f/8 that was cropped from #4 [ATTACH type="full"]143469._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
1:1 at f/36 Versus 1:2 at F/8 Cropped
Top